Deconstructing the Phenomenon of Apology

Amie Cameal Liddle

Abstract


Within Alberta Health Services, the Alberta Provincial Patient Relations Department employs Patient Relations Consultants (PRCs) to assist unsatisfied patients, investigate healthcare related concerns, and facilitate resolution. The patients, who are referred to as complainants, interpret their experience and come forward with their complaint; the PRC is responsible to then interpret the complaint and take it forward for redress. In doing so, offering complainants an apology is unavoidable. Patient relations is an interpretive practice, however, and there are shortcomings when apology is inserted into the conversation. In this article, I deconstruct apology from a patient relations perspective. I draw upon concepts in Richard Kearney’s Strangers, Gods and Monsters (2003), as well as the work of Hans-Georg Gadamer and Jacques Derrida, to present an interpretive account of how the hospital is a host to strangers, and to patients. Following an unsatisfactory experience or adverse event, the patients become complainants, or monsters. The PRCs, who are also considered hosts, receive the monsters at their door and, in turn, they can become hostages to the monsters. In attempting to achieve “otherness” with the “monsters,” the phenomenon of apology is examined.


Keywords


Hermeneutics, deconstruction, Gadamer, Richard Kearney, apology, patient complaints

Full Text:

PDF

References


Apology Act. (2015). Alberta Evidence Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. A-18. Alberta Queens Printer. Retrieved from http://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/acts/a18.pdf

Carmack, H.J. (2010). Structuring and disciplining apology: A structurational analysis of health care benevolence laws. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 11(1), 6-13. doi: 10.1080/17459430903413432

Gill, S. (2015). “Holding oneself open in a conversation”: Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics and the ethics of dialogue. Journal of Dialogue Studies, 3(1), 9-28. Retrieved from http://www.ghfp.org/Portals/ghfp/documents/Scherto_Gill2015_JDS_Dialogue%20Ethics.pdf

Gurevitch, Z.D. (1988). The other side of dialogue: On making the other strange and the experience of otherness. American Journal of Sociology, 93(5), 1179-1199. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780369

Howley, M.J. (2009). The use of apology in health care. Journal of Medical Marketing: Device, Diagnostic and Pharmaceutical Marketing, 9(4), 279-289. doi: 10.1057/jmm.2009.30

Kearney, R. (2003). Strangers, gods and monsters: Interpreting otherness. New York, NY: Routledge.

Kearney, R. (2015). Hospitality: Possible or impossible. Hospitality & Society, 5(2-3), 173-184. Retrieved from: https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/10.1386/hosp.5.2-3.173_1

Lazare, A. (2004). On apology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Moules, N.J. (2002). Hermeneutic inquiry: Paying heed to history and Hermes. An ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(3), 1-40. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1880/46345

Nietzsche, F. (n.d.). Retrieved from

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/f/friedrichn395165

Robson, R., & Pelletier, E. (2008). Giving back the pen: Disclosure, apology and early compensation discussions after harm in the healthcare setting. Healthcare Quarterly, 11(Sp), 85-90. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2008.19655

Rolfe, G. (2004). Deconstruction in a nutshell. Nursing Philosophy, 5(3), 274-276. doi:10.1111/j.1466-769X.2004.00179.x

Sihler, A.L. (2000). Language history: An introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Westmoreland, M.W. (2008). Interruptions: Derrida and hospitality. Kritike, 2(1), 1-10. doi: 10.3860/krit.v2i1.566




PID: http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5ng4h88

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.